It is very important that this be done as soon as possible. Justice Department has already announced that it plans to do so. Supreme Court to review the case, and the U.S. The federal government now can ask the U.S. Judge King’s dissent explains why the order blocking the president’s immigration initiatives is legally unsound and should be lifted. The one judge who was not in favor of affirming the Texas court’s order-Judge King-wrote a strong dissent that expands on the arguments made by a judge-Judge Higginson-who, earlier this year, dissented when the Fifth Circuit denied the federal government’s request for the emergency stay. The two judges who formed the majority in this decision, Judges Smith and Elrod, had voted earlier this year to deny the federal government’s request for an emergency stay of the Texas court’s order. Two of the judges voted to affirm the order, and one was in favor of overturning it. There were three judges on the Fifth Circuit panel that affirmed the Texas court’s order. Supreme Court to review the case, which is called Texas, et al. The Fifth Circuit’s decision means that the two initiatives remain blocked, but it also opens the door for the federal government to ask the U.S. The court in Texas issued its order earlier this year, in February, after President Obama announced the DAPA and expanded DACA initiatives last November. On November 9, 2015, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the order of a Texas federal district court that has blocked the implementation of DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents) and expanded DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). What Happens Now That the Fifth Circuit Has Issued Its Decision?